Insight / Employment

New law means employers face risk of criminal prosecution for intentional wage theft

The Crimes (Theft by Employer) Amendment Bill has now passed royal assent, becoming an enforceable provision of the Crimes Act 1961. This means that, under section 220AA of the Crimes Act 1961 (Crimes Act), it is now an offence for employers to intentionally fail to pay money owed to an employee under an employment agreement or statutory law (for example, under the Holidays Act 2003, the Minimum Wage Act 1983 and the Wages Protection Act 1983), without reasonable excuse.

Read more

Insight / Employment

Joint employment in New Zealand: can an employee have multiple employers?

Traditionally, employers have been able to carefully structure their businesses using companies, groups of companies and other entities, to protect from, or minimise, potential employment liability. However, there have been several law changes in recent years that have muddied the waters and made it more difficult for employers to use their company structure as a “shield” against employee claims.

Read more

Insight / Employment

Embracing tikanga: implications for New Zealand law

Te Piringa | Faculty of Law at The University of Waikato recently hosted Justice Whata who gave a lecture on Tikanga and the law on 24 October 2024 as part of the Norris Ward McKinnon Lecture Series.    This engaging presentation and discussion highlighted the incorporation of tikanga Māori into the mainstream New Zealand legal system. This evolution reflects a broader societal shift toward recognising Māori legal traditions as an integral component of our national identity.

Read more

Insight / Employment

A call to action: a renewed case for regulation of employment advocates

The employment jurisdiction is somewhat unique in that the institutions have historically allowed a special place for lay-advocate representatives. They carry out the same work as lawyers including representing parties in disputes, negotiations and mediations, and at the Employment Relations Authority (Authority), Employment Court and, with special leave, beyond. However, there is no regulatory framework to address issues of concern regarding an advocate’s conduct, competence or complaints. Lawyers are bound by the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 and are subject to complaints and disciplinary mechanisms. When an advocate fails to conduct themselves professionally or competently, it is the client or applicant who is at risk of a poor outcome or even costs and penalties if there is non-compliance with orders of the Authority or Court. Yet employment advocates are not answerable to any professional body.

Read more