Reforms announced related to employee misconduct and personal grievance remedies

The Minister of Workplace Relations has announced a series of significant reforms aimed at addressing employee misconduct and improving the fairness and efficiency of personal grievance claims. These changes will have a profound impact on both the legal landscape for employees and employers in New Zealand, particularly in the areas of serious misconduct and remedy adjustments in personal grievance cases.

Embracing tikanga: implications for New Zealand law

Te Piringa | Faculty of Law at The University of Waikato recently hosted Justice Whata who gave a lecture on Tikanga and the law on 24 October 2024 as part of the Norris Ward McKinnon Lecture Series.   

This engaging presentation and discussion highlighted the incorporation of tikanga Māori into the mainstream New Zealand legal system. This evolution reflects a broader societal shift toward recognising Māori legal traditions as an integral component of our national identity.

A call to action: a renewed case for regulation of employment advocates

The employment jurisdiction is somewhat unique in that the institutions have historically allowed a special place for lay-advocate representatives. They carry out the same work as lawyers including representing parties in disputes, negotiations and mediations, and at the Employment Relations Authority (Authority), Employment Court and, with special leave, beyond. However, there is no regulatory framework to address issues of concern regarding an advocate’s conduct, competence or complaints. Lawyers are bound by the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers Conduct and Client Care) Rules 2008 and are subject to complaints and disciplinary mechanisms. When an advocate fails to conduct themselves professionally or competently, it is the client or applicant who is at risk of a poor outcome or even costs and penalties if there is non-compliance with orders of the Authority or Court. Yet employment advocates are not answerable to any professional body.

Back to the future: Court of Appeal affirms earlier Uber decision, but with different reasoning

A landmark judgment in employment law has reaffirmed that Uber drivers are employees, and not contractors, under section 6 of the Employment Relations Act 2000 (Act). However, further changes to the test for employment status may not be far away.

A miscarriage of justice

This story has been described as one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in British history. It involves the British Post Office pursuing innocent workers (postmasters) for apparent financial irregularities and shortfalls which were caused by faults in its IT accounting software system that made it look like money was missing from branch accounts. Postmasters are self-employed and run branch post offices under contract to the Post Office and are liable for any loss or damage to any Post Office cash and stock and any shortfalls in the money payable to the Post Office must be made good (in full) by the postmaster.

Trial period pitfalls

In December 2023, the (then) new government had passed legislation that reintroduced the use of trial periods for new employees being available for employers of all sizes. With the increase in employers’ ability to use trial periods, it is another timely reminder that the rules regarding trial periods are enforced very strictly.