10 April 2025
Your email:
The information in these articles is general information only, is provided free of charge and does not constitute legal or other professional advice. We try to keep the information up to date. However, to the fullest extent permitted by law, we disclaim all warranties, express or implied, in relation to this article – including (without limitation) warranties as to accuracy, completeness and fitness for any particular purpose. Please seek independent advice before acting on any information in this article.
The rise of “dupe” products is becoming increasingly prevalent across various markets, including in New Zealand. Dupes, as they are colloquially known, are goods designed to replicate the appearance and quality of high-end products at a more affordable price, making them attractive to consumers.
One example is Stanley cups, which have become hugely popular, but retail for up to $90. Dupe versions of the cup, which retail for as low as $10, give consumers an opportunity to get a look-alike tumbler and participate in the trend, without the hefty price tag. While this trend benefits consumers, it poses a significant challenge to businesses trying to safeguard their brands. However, there are legal measures businesses can take to protect themselves from the threat of dupes.
A notable example of a company that has run into issues resulting from its dupe products is Aldi, the German supermarket chain, which has thousands of stores around the world. Aldi has gained notoriety for its dupe products marketed as “like brands, only cheaper.” Despite experiencing success, Aldi’s approach hasn’t been without complications. In January 2025, the UK Court of Appeal overturned an earlier favourable ruling and found that Aldi had infringed the trade mark of Thatchers Cider Company Ltd with its look-alike packaging. The Court ruled that Aldi had unfairly capitalised on Thatcher’s well-established packaging design.
While Aldi does not operate in New Zealand, it has faced similar legal challenge in Australia. The Federal Court of Australia found the supermarket chain had infringed on Hampden Holdings IP Pty Ltd’s copyright in its Baby Bellies packaging of its “puff snacks”. In this case, the Court determined that Aldi had reproduced a significant portion of Hampden’s original design, again using Hampden’s packaging as a “benchmark” for its own design.
Recourse for New Zealand brands
For New Zealand businesses facing the rise of dupe culture, there are several legal avenues available to protect their brands:
The rapid growth of dupe culture – facilitated by marketing strategies and social media – presents a challenge for both the original creators of products and the marketers of dupe goods. The reality is that dupe products are here to stay. Therefore, it is essential for businesses to adapt their legal strategies to ensure they are well-protected against the rise of dupes.
Charlene Sell – Partner, Wynn Williams’ Property & Business Advisory Team
Isabel Sullivan – Solicitor, Wynn Williams’ Property & Business Advisory Team
WWW.WYNNWILLIAMS.CO.NZ